I don’t think I have ever been more disappointed in a television event than I am with the final two episodes of Star Trek: Picard (STP). I have been clear in my admiration of this most recent iteration of the Star Trek franchise, of its plots and pacing, its strong writing and acting, its philosophy.
The last two episodes toss all of that out of the window. This finale is a terrible episode, poorly paced, poorly presented that is only saved by Alison Pill’s performance as the increasingly entertaining but inexplicable Dr Agnes Jurati. But more on that in another post.
I want you to think, long and hard, about what you saw at the end of the finale, of the image that the STP creative team presented to you of what the first season of this show built toward and what it sees as the right structure of its society:
An old white man, for whom everyone has sacrificed, in the centre, two other males from racialised communities somewhat centred but supporting him, surrounded by four female characters, diverse in their presentation, in completely subordinate roles.
This is a social structure that STP and its creative team apparently believes is the proper way of the future.
All of the earlier episodes that placed strong, intelligent women in central roles, that presented equity and equality among the races, that suggested that the pre-eminence of the cis-gender straight white human male needed to be dismantled, have been undermined by this final image.
This diverse, equitable world was out of joint, STP’s final episode seems to say, and it was up to Jean Luc Picard to put it right.
STP is a show about sacrifice. And, in the end, everyone was required to sacrifice themselves… for Jean Luc Picard first, and for the human-led Federation second.
At the heart of the show’s story arc is the question of the fate/empowerment of a new race of beings: the Synths. STP’s final episode presents this theme starkly right at the outset through this exchange between Picard (the human) and Soji (the Synth):
Soji: “You choose if we live; you choose if we die. You choose. We have no choice. The organics have never given us one.”
Picard: “To say that you have no choice is a failure of imagination. Please, don’t let the Romulans turn you into the monsters they fear… The beings you are attempting to summon, they will be your salvation but they will be our annihilation.”
Picard’s first comment is remarkably offensive. He is basically saying, “We have enslaved you; we have oppressed you. But the fault lies with you – you are failing to use your imagination to make our complete power over you seem acceptable.”
And his argument that Soji should sacrifice the Synths’ one opportunity to throw off their oppression, to take control of their own fate, so that they can avoid becoming “monsters” confirms the oppressor’s right to determine what makes a “monster”. The Romulans and Federation are not “monsters” for seeking to ban and eventually eliminate the Synth race; the Synths are, however, “monsters” if they use the power they have been given to throw off the oppression they have dealt with at the hands of the organics.
Picard fought for Data’s rights as a new life form in “Measure of a Man”; he now argues that Data’s progeny must submit themselves to the exact same control and oppression that he once resisted on behalf of his officer.
The idea that “lesser races/lesser beings” must continually sacrifice themselves for the privileged (usually straight white males) is a common theme in literature, television and films. It is sad to see it replicated here, in a television series that grows out of an original series that, for all of its flaws, presented a hope for true equity and equality.
Much has been written about how STP is a metaphor for our current times – one act of terror causes the people with power and privilege to focus on further oppressing and even annihilating the race they see as being responsible. STP was argued to be presenting a better way. But in the end STP’s better way is for the oppressed to place themselves deliberately back under the power of the oppressors, to trust them to use their power kindly
After everything she and her race have gone through, with the power in her hands to change the future for her people, Soji changes her mind and agrees to throw the Synths back into the power of the Federation. She does it, apparently, because she trusts Picard and recognises his willingness to sacrifice himself for her people.
And here is what Picard says that finally sways her:
“Show them how profoundly wrong they are about you. You are not the enemy. You are not the Destroyer. If that doesn’t convince them, then they will have to answer to the Federation. We trust you to make the right choice. I trust you, Soji. I know you. I believe in you. And that’s why I saved your lives so that you could save ours in return. That’s the whole point. That’s why we’re here. To save each other.”
But what kind of sacrifice is Picard making here? He is already dying. Actively dying, in fact, at the moment of his great “sacrifice”.
And how has he “saved” their lives? He has bought them a little bit of time, I guess, enough time perhaps that the painfully slow, ridiculously silly advanced Synth life-form snake thingee can finally make its way through the portal to lay waste to the organics (it was a full five minutes between the beacon being activated and the snake thingee finally starting to pass through the portal!).
And let’s talk about the very organic-centric, value-laden words Picard uses in his little speech:
· “You are not the enemy”: the Romulans and Federation made the Synths the enemy;
· “You are not the Destroyer”: The Destroyer of what? Of oppression? Of a corrupt power structure? Of the organics’ belief that they are entitled to rule the galaxy? We are permitted to subjugate and destroy you but you are evil if you try to throw off our oppression?
· “the right choice”: the determination of what is “right” in this context appears to lie with the organics. The “right” choice is any choice that permits the organics to maintain power and that continues the subjugation of the Synths.
· “We’re here to save each other”: this only applies when the organics are at risk; when no such risk existed, then the Synths could be subjugated, murdered even.
The creative team has Soji buy Picard’s organic-centric, oppression-continuing bullshit on behalf of her entire race (why do none of the other Synths intervene? They are hyper-intelligent, independent thinking, autonomous beings yet they simply permit a newly-arrived Synth to make all the decisions on behalf of their race).
And yet Soji was given two clear examples, in the five minutes that precede that pivotal decision, that the humans from the Federation have not changed, that they still believe they have the right to “choose if we live… choose if we die”.
First, Soong finds evidence that Sutra (the leader of the Synths) killed another Synth. He conducts no investigation, holds no trial, gives Sutra no chance to contest the evidence or defend herself, and kills her in front of the entire tribe of Synths. He executes her. An organic executes a Synth with no hearing in front of all of the other Synths and no one says “boo”.
Second, that grenade that Rios tossed? That Rios attempted to set off at the base of the beacon, in the middle of the entire Synth community? Based on the explosion we witness in the sky, would it not have killed everyone in the area of the beacon? If not by the mere force of its explosion but with the additional carnage caused by flying shrapnel from the beacon itself? Does not a group of organics (Soong, Raffi, Rios, Narek and Elnor) decide that it has the right to choose if the Synths in the area live or die? And make that decision in front of the Synths they are careless about killing?
Despite this, and despite the history, Soji chooses (on behalf of her entire race) to give up the only chance the Synths have to escape the yoke of oppression and place herself at the mercy of the Federation.
Based on the sacrifice and a few words of a dying cis-gender straight white human male who has a history of lying and of failure.
And this is what the STP creative team is presenting to us as the right and proper path for the future of the galaxy. Where is Gene Roddenberry when we really need him?